Ecuador vs North Macedonia: Claims on private sector
Claims on private sector over time
- Ecuador
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 11.0% against 9.9% in Ecuador, a difference of 1.1%.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1994 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 34th and North Macedonia ranks 32nd of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.0% | -7.1% | 15.1% | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 10.6% | 10.7% | 0.0% | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 8.8% | 5.8% | 3.0% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 9.3% | 7.1% | 2.2% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher claims on private sector, Ecuador or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 11.0% against 9.9% in Ecuador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in claims on private sector between Ecuador and North Macedonia?
- 1.1%, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and North Macedonia rank globally for claims on private sector?
- Ecuador ranks 34th and North Macedonia ranks 32nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Claims on private sector (annual growth as % of broad money). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Claims on private sector include gross credit from the financial system to individuals, enterprises, nonfinancial public entities not included under net domestic credit, and financial institutions not included elsewhere. Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator represents the annual percentage growth in the ratio of claims to broad money.