Namibia vs Romania: Claims on private sector
Claims on private sector over time
- Namibia
- Romania
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 3.4% against 3.1% in Romania, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Romania ahead.
Namibia ranks 114th and Romania ranks 117th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.3% | 17.1% | 6.8% | Romania |
| 2000s | 16.5% | 22.9% | 6.5% | Romania |
| 2010s | 9.5% | 2.3% | 7.3% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 2.1% | 5.8% | 3.7% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher claims on private sector, Namibia or Romania?
- Namibia, at 3.4% against 3.1% in Romania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in claims on private sector between Namibia and Romania?
- 0.3%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Romania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
- How do Namibia and Romania rank globally for claims on private sector?
- Namibia ranks 114th and Romania ranks 117th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Claims on private sector (annual growth as % of broad money). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Claims on private sector include gross credit from the financial system to individuals, enterprises, nonfinancial public entities not included under net domestic credit, and financial institutions not included elsewhere. Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator represents the annual percentage growth in the ratio of claims to broad money.