Serbia vs Sierra Leone: Claims on private sector
Claims on private sector over time
- Serbia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 9.6% against 9.6% in Serbia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 38th and Sierra Leone ranks 37th of 167 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 80.8% | -0.7% | 81.5% | Serbia |
| 2000s | 77.3% | 0.5% | 76.9% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 6.3% | 1.7% | 4.6% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 5.8% | 5.2% | 0.6% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher claims on private sector, Serbia or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 9.6% against 9.6% in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in claims on private sector between Serbia and Sierra Leone?
- 0.0%, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Sierra Leone?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2025.
- How do Serbia and Sierra Leone rank globally for claims on private sector?
- Serbia ranks 38th and Sierra Leone ranks 37th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Claims on private sector (annual growth as % of broad money). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Claims on private sector include gross credit from the financial system to individuals, enterprises, nonfinancial public entities not included under net domestic credit, and financial institutions not included elsewhere. Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator represents the annual percentage growth in the ratio of claims to broad money.