Türkiye vs Uzbekistan: Claims on private sector
Claims on private sector over time
- Türkiye
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 37.2% against 34.1% in Uzbekistan, a difference of 3.1%.
That makes Türkiye's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Türkiye ahead.
Türkiye ranks 6th and Uzbekistan ranks 8th of 167 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Türkiye | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20.1% | 35.8% | 15.7% | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 39.9% | 43.9% | 4.1% | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher claims on private sector, Türkiye or Uzbekistan?
- Türkiye, at 37.2% against 34.1% in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in claims on private sector between Türkiye and Uzbekistan?
- 3.1%, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Türkiye and Uzbekistan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
- How do Türkiye and Uzbekistan rank globally for claims on private sector?
- Türkiye ranks 6th and Uzbekistan ranks 8th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Claims on private sector (annual growth as % of broad money). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Claims on private sector include gross credit from the financial system to individuals, enterprises, nonfinancial public entities not included under net domestic credit, and financial institutions not included elsewhere. Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator represents the annual percentage growth in the ratio of claims to broad money.