Egypt vs Eswatini: Commercial bank branches
Commercial bank branches over time
- Egypt
- Eswatini
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 6.56 per 100,000 adults against 6.04 per 100,000 adults in Eswatini, a difference of 0.52 per 100,000 adults.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Eswatini ahead.
Egypt ranks 130th and Eswatini ranks 133rd of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.14 per 100,000 adults | 5.99 per 100,000 adults | 1.85 per 100,000 adults | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 4.89 per 100,000 adults | 6.56 per 100,000 adults | 1.67 per 100,000 adults | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 6.67 per 100,000 adults | 6.09 per 100,000 adults | 0.5764 per 100,000 adults | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher commercial bank branches, Egypt or Eswatini?
- Egypt, at 6.56 per 100,000 adults against 6.04 per 100,000 adults in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in commercial bank branches between Egypt and Eswatini?
- 0.52 per 100,000 adults, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Eswatini?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Eswatini rank globally for commercial bank branches?
- Egypt ranks 130th and Eswatini ranks 133rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Access Survey, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Commercial bank branches (per 100,000 adults). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commercial bank branches are retail locations of resident commercial banks and other resident banks that function as commercial banks that provide financial services to customers and are physically separated from the main office but not organized as legally separated subsidiaries.