Australia vs Chile: Communication Cycle (C)
Communication Cycle (C) over time
- Australia
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 106.45 against 100 in Australia, a difference of 6.45.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 25th and Chile ranks 23rd of 47 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 100 | 106.45 | 6.45 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communication cycle (c), Australia or Chile?
- Chile, at 106.45 against 100 in Australia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in communication cycle (c) between Australia and Chile?
- 6.45, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chile?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Australia and Chile rank globally for communication cycle (c)?
- Australia ranks 25th and Chile ranks 23rd of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Communication Cycle (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).