Australia vs Uruguay: Communication Cycle (C)
Communication Cycle (C) over time
- Australia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 106.45 against 100 in Australia, a difference of 6.45.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Uruguay ahead.
Australia ranks 25th and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 47 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 100 | 100.38 | 0.3826 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communication cycle (c), Australia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 106.45 against 100 in Australia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in communication cycle (c) between Australia and Uruguay?
- 6.45, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Uruguay?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Australia and Uruguay rank globally for communication cycle (c)?
- Australia ranks 25th and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Communication Cycle (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).