Indonesia vs Tanzania: Communication Cycle (C)

Indonesia
88.25
in 2018
Tanzania
93.94
in 2018
Indonesia rank
43rd
Tanzania rank
41st

Communication Cycle (C) over time

  • Indonesia
  • Tanzania
020406080100201020142018

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 93.94 against 88.25 in Indonesia, a difference of 5.69.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 43rd and Tanzania ranks 41st of 47 countries.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher communication cycle (c), Indonesia or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 93.94 against 88.25 in Indonesia as of 2018.
What is the difference in communication cycle (c) between Indonesia and Tanzania?
5.69, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Tanzania?
9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
How do Indonesia and Tanzania rank globally for communication cycle (c)?
Indonesia ranks 43rd and Tanzania ranks 41st of 47 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Communication Cycle (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Tanzania: Communication Cycle (C). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/communication-cycle-c-index/indonesia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/communication-cycle-c-index/indonesia/tanzania/">Indonesia vs Tanzania: Communication Cycle (C)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Communication Cycle (C) (Index)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
48 places, 546 data points, 2007–2018
Last refreshed

Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).