Malaysia vs Pakistan: Communication Cycle (C)
Communication Cycle (C) over time
- Malaysia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 128.4 against 120.62 in Pakistan, a difference of 7.78.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Pakistan ahead.
Malaysia ranks 14th and Pakistan ranks 17th of 47 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 126.67 | 90.61 | 36.07 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communication cycle (c), Malaysia or Pakistan?
- Malaysia, at 128.4 against 120.62 in Pakistan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in communication cycle (c) between Malaysia and Pakistan?
- 7.78, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Pakistan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Malaysia and Pakistan rank globally for communication cycle (c)?
- Malaysia ranks 14th and Pakistan ranks 17th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Communication Cycle (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).