New Zealand vs Pakistan: Communication Cycle (C)
Communication Cycle (C) over time
- New Zealand
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 120.62 against 113.31 in New Zealand, a difference of 7.31.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Pakistan ahead.
New Zealand ranks 20th and Pakistan ranks 17th of 47 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 94.01 | 90.61 | 3.41 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communication cycle (c), New Zealand or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 120.62 against 113.31 in New Zealand as of 2018.
- What is the difference in communication cycle (c) between New Zealand and Pakistan?
- 7.31, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Pakistan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do New Zealand and Pakistan rank globally for communication cycle (c)?
- New Zealand ranks 20th and Pakistan ranks 17th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Communication Cycle (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).