New Zealand vs Uruguay: Communication Cycle (C)
Communication Cycle (C) over time
- New Zealand
- Uruguay
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 113.31 against 106.45 in Uruguay, a difference of 6.86.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Uruguay ahead.
New Zealand ranks 20th and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 47 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 94.01 | 100.38 | 6.37 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communication cycle (c), New Zealand or Uruguay?
- New Zealand, at 113.31 against 106.45 in Uruguay as of 2018.
- What is the difference in communication cycle (c) between New Zealand and Uruguay?
- 6.86, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uruguay?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do New Zealand and Uruguay rank globally for communication cycle (c)?
- New Zealand ranks 20th and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Communication Cycle (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).