Pakistan vs Poland: Communication Cycle (C)
Communication Cycle (C) over time
- Pakistan
- Poland
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 120.62 against 113.31 in Poland, a difference of 7.31.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Poland ahead.
Pakistan ranks 17th and Poland ranks 20th of 47 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 90.61 | 141.92 | 51.32 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communication cycle (c), Pakistan or Poland?
- Pakistan, at 120.62 against 113.31 in Poland as of 2018.
- What is the difference in communication cycle (c) between Pakistan and Poland?
- 7.31, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Poland?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Pakistan and Poland rank globally for communication cycle (c)?
- Pakistan ranks 17th and Poland ranks 20th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Communication Cycle (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).