Mexico vs Nigeria: Communications (C)

Mexico
98.44
in 2018
Nigeria
100
in 2018
Mexico rank
45th
Nigeria rank
43rd

Communications (C) over time

  • Mexico
  • Nigeria
0255075100200720122018

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 100 against 98.44 in Mexico, a difference of 1.56.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 45th and Nigeria ranks 43rd of 47 countries.

Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher communications (c), Mexico or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 100 against 98.44 in Mexico as of 2018.
What is the difference in communications (c) between Mexico and Nigeria?
1.56, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Nigeria?
6 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2018.
How do Mexico and Nigeria rank globally for communications (c)?
Mexico ranks 45th and Nigeria ranks 43rd of 47 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Communications (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Nigeria: Communications (C). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/communications-c-index/mexico/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/communications-c-index/mexico/nigeria/">Mexico vs Nigeria: Communications (C)</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Communications (C) (Index)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 582 data points, 2007–2018
Last refreshed

Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).