Nigeria vs Serbia: Communications (C)

Nigeria
100
in 2018
Serbia
99.3
in 2018
Nigeria rank
43rd
Serbia rank
44th

Communications (C) over time

  • Nigeria
  • Serbia
0255075100201020142018

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 100 against 99.3 in Serbia, a difference of 0.7.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Serbia ahead.

Nigeria ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 44th of 47 countries.

Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher communications (c), Nigeria or Serbia?
Nigeria, at 100 against 99.3 in Serbia as of 2018.
What is the difference in communications (c) between Nigeria and Serbia?
0.7, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Serbia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2018.
How do Nigeria and Serbia rank globally for communications (c)?
Nigeria ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 44th of 47 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Communications (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nigeria vs Serbia: Communications (C). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/communications-c-index/nigeria/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/communications-c-index/nigeria/serbia/">Nigeria vs Serbia: Communications (C)</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Communications (C) (Index)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 582 data points, 2007–2018
Last refreshed

Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).