Poland vs Tanzania: Communications (C)

Poland
105.71
in 2018
Tanzania
103.13
in 2018
Poland rank
38th
Tanzania rank
41st

Communications (C) over time

  • Poland
  • Tanzania
0255075100125200720122018

How they compare

Poland currently reports 105.71 against 103.13 in Tanzania, a difference of 2.58.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 38th and Tanzania ranks 41st of 47 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher communications (c), Poland or Tanzania?
Poland, at 105.71 against 103.13 in Tanzania as of 2018.
What is the difference in communications (c) between Poland and Tanzania?
2.58, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Tanzania?
9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
How do Poland and Tanzania rank globally for communications (c)?
Poland ranks 38th and Tanzania ranks 41st of 47 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Communications (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Tanzania: Communications (C). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/communications-c-index/poland/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/communications-c-index/poland/tanzania/">Poland vs Tanzania: Communications (C)</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Communications (C) (Index)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 582 data points, 2007–2018
Last refreshed

Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).