Armenia vs United Kingdom: Contingent short-term net: Guidelines for a Data … Security Social

Armenia
261.71 million
in 2025
United Kingdom
0
in 2016
Armenia rank
10th
United Kingdom rank
13th

Contingent short-term net: Guidelines for a Data … Security Social over time

  • Armenia
  • United Kingdom
-750.0M-500.0M-250.0M0250.0M200020122025

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 261.71 million against 0 in United Kingdom, a difference of 261.71 million.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2003 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Armenia ranks 10th and United Kingdom ranks 13th of 79 countries.

Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s -74.66 million -220.90 million 146.24 million Armenia
2010s 108.86 million 0 108.86 million Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Armenia or United Kingdom?
Armenia, at 261.71 million against 0 in United Kingdom as of 2025.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Armenia and United Kingdom?
261.71 million, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and United Kingdom?
11 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2016.
How do Armenia and United Kingdom rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Armenia ranks 10th and United Kingdom ranks 13th of 79 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs United Kingdom: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 November 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total/armenia/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total/armenia/united-kingdom/">Armenia vs United Kingdom: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
81 places, 1,433 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.