Bulgaria vs New Zealand: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Bulgaria
-43.71 million
in 2025
New Zealand
-4.12 million
in 2012
Bulgaria rank
36th
New Zealand rank
34th

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Bulgaria
  • New Zealand
-200.0M-100.0M0100.0M200020122025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports -4.12 million against -43.71 million in Bulgaria, a difference of 39.59 million.

Across all 6 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Bulgaria ranks 36th and New Zealand ranks 34th of 79 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s -73.13 million 67.05 million 140.19 million New Zealand
2010s -114.26 million -1.61 million 112.65 million New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Bulgaria or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at -4.12 million against -43.71 million in Bulgaria as of 2012.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Bulgaria and New Zealand?
39.59 million, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and New Zealand?
6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2012.
How do Bulgaria and New Zealand rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Bulgaria ranks 36th and New Zealand ranks 34th of 79 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bulgaria vs New Zealand: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total/bulgaria/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total/bulgaria/new-zealand/">Bulgaria vs New Zealand: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
81 places, 1,433 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.