Chile vs Poland: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Chile
14.33 billion
in 2025
Poland
16.64 billion
in 2025
Chile rank
5th
Poland rank
4th

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Chile
  • Poland
010.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B200020122025

How they compare

Poland currently reports 16.64 billion against 14.33 billion in Chile, a difference of 2.30 billion.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 5th and Poland ranks 4th of 79 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Poland Difference Ahead
2000s -9.06 million 1.30 billion 1.31 billion Poland
2010s 0 28.79 billion 28.79 billion Poland
2020s 18.84 billion 13.60 billion 5.24 billion Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Chile or Poland?
Poland, at 16.64 billion against 14.33 billion in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Chile and Poland?
2.30 billion, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Poland?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Chile and Poland rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Chile ranks 5th and Poland ranks 4th of 79 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Poland: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total/chile/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total/chile/poland/">Chile vs Poland: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
81 places, 1,433 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.