Costa Rica vs Georgia: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Costa Rica
-2.69 billion
in 2025
Georgia
-2.18 billion
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
68th
Georgia rank
65th

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Georgia
-4.0B-3.0B-2.0B-1.0B0201020172025

How they compare

Georgia currently reports -2.18 billion against -2.69 billion in Costa Rica, a difference of 510.65 million.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Georgia ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 68th and Georgia ranks 65th of 79 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Georgia Difference Ahead
2010s -1.57 billion -872.76 million 693.42 million Georgia
2020s -2.23 billion -1.90 billion 328.09 million Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Costa Rica or Georgia?
Georgia, at -2.18 billion against -2.69 billion in Costa Rica as of 2025.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Costa Rica and Georgia?
510.65 million, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Georgia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
How do Costa Rica and Georgia rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Costa Rica ranks 68th and Georgia ranks 65th of 79 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Georgia: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total/costa-rica/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total/costa-rica/georgia/">Costa Rica vs Georgia: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
81 places, 1,433 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.