Hungary vs Mongolia: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Hungary
137.47 million
in 2025
Mongolia
1.29 billion
in 2025
Hungary rank
11th
Mongolia rank
9th

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Hungary
  • Mongolia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B200020122025

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 1.29 billion against 137.47 million in Hungary, a difference of 1.15 billion.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 9.4 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 11th and Mongolia ranks 9th of 79 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Mongolia Difference Ahead
2010s 240.22 million 433.55 million 193.33 million Mongolia
2020s 368.24 million 754.69 million 386.45 million Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Hungary or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 1.29 billion against 137.47 million in Hungary as of 2025.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Hungary and Mongolia?
1.15 billion, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Mongolia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2025.
How do Hungary and Mongolia rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Hungary ranks 11th and Mongolia ranks 9th of 79 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Mongolia: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total/hungary/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total/hungary/mongolia/">Hungary vs Mongolia: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
81 places, 1,433 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.