Lithuania vs New Zealand: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)

Lithuania
-217,740
in 2015
New Zealand
-4.12 million
in 2012
Lithuania rank
33rd
New Zealand rank
34th

Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) over time

  • Lithuania
  • New Zealand
-200.0M-100.0M0100.0M200020072015

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports -217,740 against -4.12 million in New Zealand, a difference of 3.90 million.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2004 it was New Zealand ahead.

Lithuania ranks 33rd and New Zealand ranks 34th of 79 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s -92.25 million 50.96 million 143.21 million New Zealand
2010s 35.57 million -1.61 million 37.18 million Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal), Lithuania or New Zealand?
Lithuania, at -217,740 against -4.12 million in New Zealand as of 2015.
What is the difference in contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal) between Lithuania and New Zealand?
3.90 million, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and New Zealand?
5 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2012.
How do Lithuania and New Zealand rank globally for contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)?
Lithuania ranks 33rd and New Zealand ranks 34th of 79 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs New Zealand: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total/lithuania/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/contingent-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total/lithuania/new-zealand/">Lithuania vs New Zealand: Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contingent short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
81 places, 1,433 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.