Conflict-affected states vs Iraq: Current account balance (credit less debit), Percent of GDP (Balance)

Conflict-affected states
-2.2
in 2030
Iraq
0.8662
in 2030
Conflict-affected states rank
7th
Iraq rank
9th

Current account balance (credit less debit), Percent of GDP (Balance) over time

  • Conflict-affected states
  • Iraq
-10-5051015200020152030

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 0.8662 against -2.2 in Conflict-affected states, a difference of 3.07.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Conflict-affected states ahead.

Conflict-affected states ranks 7th and Iraq ranks 9th of 13 groups.

Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Conflict-affected states Iraq Difference Ahead
2000s 0.1227 2.75 2.63 Iraq
2010s -1.57 4.43 6 Iraq
2020s -2.2 2.27 4.48 Iraq
2030s -2.2 0.8662 3.07 Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher current account balance (credit less debit), percent of gdp (balance), Conflict-affected states or Iraq?
Iraq, at 0.8662 against -2.2 in Conflict-affected states as of 2030.
What is the difference in current account balance (credit less debit), percent of gdp (balance) between Conflict-affected states and Iraq?
3.07, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Conflict-affected states and Iraq?
27 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2030.
How do Conflict-affected states and Iraq rank globally for current account balance (credit less debit), percent of gdp (balance)?
Conflict-affected states ranks 7th and Iraq ranks 9th of 13 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Current account balance (credit less debit), Percent of GDP (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Conflict-affected states vs Iraq: Current account balance (credit less debit), Percent of GDP (Balance). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/current-account-balance-credit-less-debit-percent-of-gdp-balance-of-payments-and/conflict-affected-states/iraq/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/current-account-balance-credit-less-debit-percent-of-gdp-balance-of-payments-and/conflict-affected-states/iraq/">Conflict-affected states vs Iraq: Current account balance (credit less debit), Percent of GDP (Balance)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Current account balance (credit less debit), Percent of GDP (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
45 places, 1,290 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.