Japan vs South Africa: Delegation and Designation of Responsibility (IA)

Japan
96.72
in 2018
South Africa
87.52
in 2018
Japan rank
43rd
South Africa rank
46th

Delegation and Designation of Responsibility (IA) over time

  • Japan
  • South Africa
020406080100200720122018

How they compare

Japan currently reports 96.72 against 87.52 in South Africa, a difference of 9.2.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was South Africa ahead.

Japan ranks 43rd and South Africa ranks 46th of 47 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan South Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 100 100 0
2010s 98.91 80.74 18.17 Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher delegation and designation of responsibility (ia), Japan or South Africa?
Japan, at 96.72 against 87.52 in South Africa as of 2018.
What is the difference in delegation and designation of responsibility (ia) between Japan and South Africa?
9.2, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and South Africa?
12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
How do Japan and South Africa rank globally for delegation and designation of responsibility (ia)?
Japan ranks 43rd and South Africa ranks 46th of 47 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Delegation and Designation of Responsibility (IA) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs South Africa: Delegation and Designation of Responsibility (IA). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/delegation-and-designation-of-responsibility-ia-index/japan/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/delegation-and-designation-of-responsibility-ia-index/japan/south-africa/">Japan vs South Africa: Delegation and Designation of Responsibility (IA)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Delegation and Designation of Responsibility (IA) (Index)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
48 places, 546 data points, 2007–2018
Last refreshed

Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).