Malta vs Samoa: Depositors with commercial banks
Depositors with commercial banks over time
- Malta
- Samoa
How they compare
Malta currently reports 1,449 per 1,000 adults against 1,416 per 1,000 adults in Samoa, a difference of 33 per 1,000 adults.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 24th and Samoa ranks 26th of 104 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,429 per 1,000 adults | 907.88 per 1,000 adults | 521.28 per 1,000 adults | Malta |
| 2020s | 1,494 per 1,000 adults | 1,278 per 1,000 adults | 215.55 per 1,000 adults | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher depositors with commercial banks, Malta or Samoa?
- Malta, at 1,449 per 1,000 adults against 1,416 per 1,000 adults in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in depositors with commercial banks between Malta and Samoa?
- 33 per 1,000 adults, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Samoa?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Samoa rank globally for depositors with commercial banks?
- Malta ranks 24th and Samoa ranks 26th of 104 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Access Survey, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Depositors with commercial banks (per 1,000 adults). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Depositors with commercial banks are the reported number of deposit account holders, including both resident non-financial corporations (both public and private) and individuals from the household sector, at commercial banks within the reporting jurisdiction for every 1,000 adults. The major types of deposits are checking accounts, savings accounts, and time deposits.