Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) vs United Kingdom: Direct investment, Net acquisition of financial assets, Assets

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)
6.68 billion
in 2024
United Kingdom
68.31 billion
in 2024
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) rank
8th
United Kingdom rank
9th

Direct investment, Net acquisition of financial assets, Assets over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)
  • United Kingdom
-100.0B0100.0B200.0B300.0B400.0B200520142024

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 68.31 billion against 6.68 billion in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), a difference of 61.63 billion.

That makes United Kingdom's figure about 10.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)'s.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) ranks 8th and United Kingdom ranks 9th of 9 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s 4.41 billion 196.17 billion 191.76 billion United Kingdom
2010s 19.65 billion 17.42 billion 2.23 billion Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)
2020s 9.78 billion 80.11 billion 70.33 billion United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher direct investment, net acquisition of financial assets, assets, Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 68.31 billion against 6.68 billion in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) as of 2024.
What is the difference in direct investment, net acquisition of financial assets, assets between Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and United Kingdom?
61.63 billion, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and United Kingdom?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and United Kingdom rank globally for direct investment, net acquisition of financial assets, assets?
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) ranks 8th and United Kingdom ranks 9th of 9 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Direct investment, Net acquisition of financial assets, Assets (US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) vs United Kingdom: Direct investment, Net acquisition of financial assets, Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/direct-investment-net-acquisition-of-financial-assets-assets-us-dollar/sub-saharan-africa-ssa/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/direct-investment-net-acquisition-of-financial-assets-assets-us-dollar/sub-saharan-africa-ssa/united-kingdom/">Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) vs United Kingdom: Direct investment, Net acquisition of financial assets, Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Direct investment, Net acquisition of financial assets, Assets (US dollar)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
200 places, 3,600 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

The World and Country Group Aggregates (historically called BOPSY) is an annual publication, released each November, of major balance of payments and international investment position components for countries, country groups, and the world.