Israel vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Domestic Claims, Claims on Central or General Government, Net Claims

Israel
-7,781 units per person
in 2009
Tanzania, United Republic of
-7,868 units per person
in 2008
Israel rank
144th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
145th

Domestic Claims, Claims on Central or General Government, Net Claims over time

  • Israel
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
-10.0k010.0k20.0k196019842009

How they compare

Israel currently reports -7,781 units per person against -7,868 units per person in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 87 units per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Israel ahead.

Israel ranks 144th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 145th of 176 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0501 units per person -4.63 units per person 4.68 units per person Israel
1970s 1.5 units per person 138.78 units per person 137.28 units per person Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 4,408 units per person 1,235 units per person 3,172 units per person Israel
1990s 6,451 units per person 11,220 units per person 4,769 units per person Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s -6,189 units per person 142.95 units per person 6,332 units per person Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher domestic claims, claims on central or general government, net claims, Israel or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Israel, at -7,781 units per person against -7,868 units per person in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2009.
What is the difference in domestic claims, claims on central or general government, net claims between Israel and Tanzania, United Republic of?
87 units per person, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Tanzania, United Republic of?
43 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2008.
How do Israel and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for domestic claims, claims on central or general government, net claims?
Israel ranks 144th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 145th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Domestic Claims, Claims on Central or General Government, Net Claims on Central or General Government (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Domestic Claims, Claims on Central or General Government, Net Claims. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-claims-claims-on-central-or-general-government-net-claims-on-central-or-general-2/israel/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-claims-claims-on-central-or-general-government-net-claims-on-central-or-general-2/israel/tanzania/">Israel vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Domestic Claims, Claims on Central or General Government, Net Claims</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Domestic Claims, Claims on Central or General Government, Net Claims on Central or General Government (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 6,835 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Domestic Claims, Claims on Central or General Government, Net Claims on Central or General Government (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.