Belarus vs Iraq: Domestic Claims, Claims on Central or General Government, Net Claims
Belarus
-154.56 units per US$ of GDP
in 2008
Iraq
-228.86 units per US$ of GDP
in 2008
Belarus rank
170th
Iraq rank
171st
Domestic Claims, Claims on Central or General Government, Net Claims over time
- Belarus
- Iraq
How they compare
Belarus currently reports -154.56 units per US$ of GDP against -228.86 units per US$ of GDP in Iraq, a difference of 74.3 units per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iraq ahead.
Belarus ranks 170th and Iraq ranks 171st of 174 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher domestic claims, claims on central or general government, net claims, Belarus or Iraq?
- Belarus, at -154.56 units per US$ of GDP against -228.86 units per US$ of GDP in Iraq as of 2008.
- What is the difference in domestic claims, claims on central or general government, net claims between Belarus and Iraq?
- 74.3 units per US$ of GDP, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Iraq?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2008.
- How do Belarus and Iraq rank globally for domestic claims, claims on central or general government, net claims?
- Belarus ranks 170th and Iraq ranks 171st of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Domestic Claims, Claims on Central or General Government, Net Claims on Central or General Government (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Domestic Claims, Claims on Central or General Government, Net Claims on Central or General Government (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.