Sao Tome and Principe vs Zimbabwe: Domestic Claims, Claims on Central or General Government, Net Claims

Sao Tome and Principe
-453.17 million units per square kilometre
in 2008
Zimbabwe
-60,662.30 trillion units per square kilometre
in 2008
Sao Tome and Principe rank
169th
Zimbabwe rank
172nd

Domestic Claims, Claims on Central or General Government, Net Claims over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Zimbabwe
-60,000.0T-40,000.0T-20,000.0T0197919932008

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports -453.17 million units per square kilometre against -60,662.30 trillion units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 60,662.30 trillion units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 169th and Zimbabwe ranks 172nd of 172 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s -252,848 units per square kilometre 41.62 units per square kilometre 252,890 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s -114.50 million units per square kilometre -6,740.26 trillion units per square kilometre 6,740.26 trillion units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher domestic claims, claims on central or general government, net claims, Sao Tome and Principe or Zimbabwe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at -453.17 million units per square kilometre against -60,662.30 trillion units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2008.
What is the difference in domestic claims, claims on central or general government, net claims between Sao Tome and Principe and Zimbabwe?
60,662.30 trillion units per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Zimbabwe?
14 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2008.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Zimbabwe rank globally for domestic claims, claims on central or general government, net claims?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 169th and Zimbabwe ranks 172nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Domestic Claims, Claims on Central or General Government, Net Claims on Central or General Government (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Zimbabwe: Domestic Claims, Claims on Central or General Government, Net Claims. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-claims-claims-on-central-or-general-government-net-claims-on-central-or-general-4/sao-tome-and-principe/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-claims-claims-on-central-or-general-government-net-claims-on-central-or-general-4/sao-tome-and-principe/zimbabwe/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Zimbabwe: Domestic Claims, Claims on Central or General Government, Net Claims</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Domestic Claims, Claims on Central or General Government, Net Claims on Central or General Government (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 6,613 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Domestic Claims, Claims on Central or General Government, Net Claims on Central or General Government (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.