Botswana vs Jordan: Domestic Claims, Claims on Other Financial Corporations
Botswana
126.33 million
in 2008
Jordan
178.08 million
in 2016
Botswana rank
70th
Jordan rank
67th
Domestic Claims, Claims on Other Financial Corporations over time
- Botswana
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 178.08 million against 126.33 million in Botswana, a difference of 51.75 million.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.4 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 70th and Jordan ranks 67th of 104 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 100.58 million | 18.67 million | 81.92 million | Botswana |
| 2000s | 79.50 million | 85.09 million | 5.58 million | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher domestic claims, claims on other financial corporations, Botswana or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 178.08 million against 126.33 million in Botswana as of 2016.
- What is the difference in domestic claims, claims on other financial corporations between Botswana and Jordan?
- 51.75 million, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Jordan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2008.
- How do Botswana and Jordan rank globally for domestic claims, claims on other financial corporations?
- Botswana ranks 70th and Jordan ranks 67th of 104 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Domestic Claims, Claims on Other Financial Corporations (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Monetary and Financial Statistics (MFS), Non-standard dataset provides discontinued, vintage country-reported financial data that are not harmonized and use country-specific terms.