Rwanda vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Domestic Claims (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency)

Rwanda
4.69 million units per square kilometre
in 2005
Tanzania, United Republic of
4.77 million units per square kilometre
in 2008
Rwanda rank
84th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
83rd

Domestic Claims (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) over time

  • Rwanda
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196419862008

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 4.77 million units per square kilometre against 4.69 million units per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 70,840 units per square kilometre.

Across all 40 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 84th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 83rd of 172 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 59,577 units per square kilometre 957.51 units per square kilometre 58,620 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 154,208 units per square kilometre 7,459 units per square kilometre 146,750 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 632,554 units per square kilometre 70,721 units per square kilometre 561,833 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 2.16 million units per square kilometre 630,534 units per square kilometre 1.53 million units per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 4.24 million units per square kilometre 1.19 million units per square kilometre 3.04 million units per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher domestic claims (depository corporations survey, domestic currency), Rwanda or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 4.77 million units per square kilometre against 4.69 million units per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2008.
What is the difference in domestic claims (depository corporations survey, domestic currency) between Rwanda and Tanzania, United Republic of?
70,840 units per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tanzania, United Republic of?
40 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2005.
How do Rwanda and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for domestic claims (depository corporations survey, domestic currency)?
Rwanda ranks 84th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 83rd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Domestic Claims (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Domestic Claims (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-claims-depository-corporations-survey-domestic-currency-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-claims-depository-corporations-survey-domestic-currency-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/tanzania/">Rwanda vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Domestic Claims (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Domestic Claims (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 6,623 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Domestic Claims (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.