Australia vs Chile: External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions bond
Australia
2
in 2014
Chile
2
in 2014
Australia rank
1st
Chile rank
1st
External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions bond over time
- Australia
- Chile
How they compare
Australia currently reports 2 against 2 in Chile, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Chile ahead.
Australia ranks 1st and Chile ranks 1st of 59 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.3 | Chile |
| 1990s | 1.15 | 1.45 | 0.3 | Chile |
| 2000s | 1.8 | 1.75 | 0.05 | Australia |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions bond, Australia or Chile?
- Australia, at 2 against 2 in Chile as of 2014.
- What is the difference in external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions bond between Australia and Chile?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chile?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Chile rank globally for external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions bond?
- Australia ranks 1st and Chile ranks 1st of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions bond. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.