Australia vs Sweden: External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions bond
Australia
2
in 2014
Sweden
2
in 2014
Australia rank
1st
Sweden rank
1st
External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions bond over time
- Australia
- Sweden
How they compare
Australia currently reports 2 against 2 in Sweden, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Sweden ahead.
Australia ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 59 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.6 | 1.15 | 0.55 | Sweden |
| 1990s | 1.15 | 1.9 | 0.75 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 1.8 | 2 | 0.2 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions bond, Australia or Sweden?
- Australia, at 2 against 2 in Sweden as of 2014.
- What is the difference in external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions bond between Australia and Sweden?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Sweden rank globally for external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions bond?
- Australia ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions bond. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.