Chile vs New Zealand: External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions bond
Chile
2
in 2014
New Zealand
2
in 2014
Chile rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st
External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions bond over time
- Chile
- New Zealand
How they compare
Chile currently reports 2 against 2 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 31 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 59 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1 | 2 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 1.45 | 2 | 0.55 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 1.75 | 2 | 0.25 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions bond, Chile or New Zealand?
- Chile, at 2 against 2 in New Zealand as of 2014.
- What is the difference in external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions bond between Chile and New Zealand?
- 0, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Zealand?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2014.
- How do Chile and New Zealand rank globally for external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions bond?
- Chile ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions bond. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.