Finland vs Ghana: External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions bond
Finland
2
in 2014
Ghana
2
in 2014
Finland rank
1st
Ghana rank
1st
External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions bond over time
- Finland
- Ghana
How they compare
Finland currently reports 2 against 2 in Ghana, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 1st and Ghana ranks 1st of 59 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1 | 0.55 | 0.45 | Finland |
| 1990s | 1.9 | 0.8 | 1.1 | Finland |
| 2000s | 2 | 1.25 | 0.75 | Finland |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions bond, Finland or Ghana?
- Finland, at 2 against 2 in Ghana as of 2014.
- What is the difference in external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions bond between Finland and Ghana?
- 0, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Ghana?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2014.
- How do Finland and Ghana rank globally for external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions bond?
- Finland ranks 1st and Ghana ranks 1st of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions bond. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.