Singapore vs Sweden: External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions bond
Singapore
2
in 2014
Sweden
2
in 2014
Singapore rank
1st
Sweden rank
1st
External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions bond over time
- Singapore
- Sweden
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 2 against 2 in Sweden, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Singapore ahead.
Singapore ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 59 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.7 | 1.15 | 0.55 | Singapore |
| 1990s | 1.4 | 1.9 | 0.5 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions bond, Singapore or Sweden?
- Singapore, at 2 against 2 in Sweden as of 2014.
- What is the difference in external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions bond between Singapore and Sweden?
- 0, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2014.
- How do Singapore and Sweden rank globally for external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions bond?
- Singapore ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions bond. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.