Finland vs Philippines: External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions money market instrument
Finland
1.5
in 2014
Philippines
1.5
in 2014
Finland rank
21st
Philippines rank
21st
External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions money market instrument over time
- Finland
- Philippines
How they compare
Finland currently reports 1.5 against 1.5 in Philippines, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 21st and Philippines ranks 21st of 59 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.05 | 0.5 | 0.55 | Finland |
| 1990s | 1.95 | 1.25 | 0.7 | Finland |
| 2000s | 1.7 | 1.9 | 0.2 | Philippines |
| 2010s | 1.5 | 1.6 | 0.1 | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions money market instrument, Finland or Philippines?
- Finland, at 1.5 against 1.5 in Philippines as of 2014.
- What is the difference in external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions money market instrument between Finland and Philippines?
- 0, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Philippines?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2014.
- How do Finland and Philippines rank globally for external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions money market instrument?
- Finland ranks 21st and Philippines ranks 21st of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions money market instrument. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.