Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions money market instrument
Malaysia
1
in 2014
Zimbabwe
1
in 2014
Malaysia rank
42nd
Zimbabwe rank
42nd
External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions money market instrument over time
- Malaysia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 1 against 1 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 42nd of 59 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.7 | 1.15 | 0.45 | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 0.5 | 0.95 | 0.45 | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions money market instrument, Malaysia or Zimbabwe?
- Malaysia, at 1 against 1 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions money market instrument between Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2014.
- How do Malaysia and Zimbabwe rank globally for external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions money market instrument?
- Malaysia ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 42nd of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions money market instrument. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.