Malaysia vs Uruguay: Financial Arrangements (IA)
Financial Arrangements (IA) over time
- Malaysia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 119.3 against 115.84 in Uruguay, a difference of 3.46.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Uruguay ahead.
Malaysia ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 4th of 47 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 119.3 | 115.84 | 3.46 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial arrangements (ia), Malaysia or Uruguay?
- Malaysia, at 119.3 against 115.84 in Uruguay as of 2018.
- What is the difference in financial arrangements (ia) between Malaysia and Uruguay?
- 3.46, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Uruguay?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Malaysia and Uruguay rank globally for financial arrangements (ia)?
- Malaysia ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 4th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Arrangements (IA) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).