Algeria vs Ecuador: Financial Development Index
Financial Development Index over time
- Algeria
- Ecuador
How they compare
Algeria currently reports 0.1373 against 0.1305 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0068.
That makes Algeria's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Ecuador ahead.
Algeria ranks 140th and Ecuador ranks 143rd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1151 | 0.2041 | 0.089 | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 0.1213 | 0.1177 | 0.0036 | Algeria |
| 2000s | 0.1191 | 0.1223 | 0.0032 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.1288 | 0.1567 | 0.0279 | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.1373 | 0.1305 | 0.0067 | Algeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial development index, Algeria or Ecuador?
- Algeria, at 0.1373 against 0.1305 in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial development index between Algeria and Ecuador?
- 0.0068, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Ecuador?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Algeria and Ecuador rank globally for financial development index?
- Algeria ranks 140th and Ecuador ranks 143rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Development Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.