Bangladesh vs Pakistan: Financial Development Index
Financial Development Index over time
- Bangladesh
- Pakistan
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 0.2439 against 0.2294 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0145.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 96th and Pakistan ranks 99th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.141 | 0.112 | 0.029 | Bangladesh |
| 1990s | 0.1639 | 0.1764 | 0.0124 | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 0.1799 | 0.324 | 0.1442 | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0.2364 | 0.204 | 0.0324 | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 0.2439 | 0.2294 | 0.0145 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial development index, Bangladesh or Pakistan?
- Bangladesh, at 0.2439 against 0.2294 in Pakistan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial development index between Bangladesh and Pakistan?
- 0.0145, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Pakistan?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Bangladesh and Pakistan rank globally for financial development index?
- Bangladesh ranks 96th and Pakistan ranks 99th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Development Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.