Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Jordan: Financial Development Index
Financial Development Index over time
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.3486 against 0.3346 in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 0.014.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 70th and Jordan ranks 68th of 183 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia (Plurinational State of) | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1115 | 0.5155 | 0.404 | Jordan |
| 1990s | 0.1081 | 0.5137 | 0.4056 | Jordan |
| 2000s | 0.1476 | 0.5225 | 0.3748 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0.2653 | 0.3842 | 0.1189 | Jordan |
| 2020s | 0.3346 | 0.3486 | 0.014 | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial development index, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 0.3486 against 0.3346 in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial development index between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Jordan?
- 0.014, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Jordan?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Jordan rank globally for financial development index?
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 70th and Jordan ranks 68th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Development Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.