Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sri Lanka: Financial Development Index
Financial Development Index over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0.2634 against 0.2576 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.0058.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 91st and Sri Lanka ranks 90th of 183 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.1747 | 0.1747 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 0.0658 | 0.1757 | 0.1099 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0.1577 | 0.2315 | 0.0738 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0.2459 | 0.2671 | 0.0211 | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0.2576 | 0.2634 | 0.0058 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial development index, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 0.2634 against 0.2576 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial development index between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0058, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sri Lanka?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sri Lanka rank globally for financial development index?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 91st and Sri Lanka ranks 90th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Development Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.