Chad vs Equatorial Guinea: Financial Development Index
Financial Development Index over time
- Chad
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0839 against 0.082 in Chad, a difference of 0.0019.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 175th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 174th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1224 | 0.0524 | 0.07 | Chad |
| 1990s | 0.1029 | 0.1107 | 0.0078 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.069 | 0.0854 | 0.0164 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.0775 | 0.0773 | 0.0002 | Chad |
| 2020s | 0.082 | 0.0839 | 0.0018 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial development index, Chad or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0839 against 0.082 in Chad as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial development index between Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.0019, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Chad and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for financial development index?
- Chad ranks 175th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 174th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Development Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.