Côte d'Ivoire vs Kyrgyzstan: Financial Development Index
Financial Development Index over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 0.1417 against 0.1374 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0043.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Côte d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 138th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 139th of 183 countries.
Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1232 | 0 | 0.1232 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 1990s | 0.1702 | 0.0432 | 0.127 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2000s | 0.1279 | 0.0813 | 0.0466 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 0.1625 | 0.1085 | 0.054 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2020s | 0.1417 | 0.1374 | 0.0043 | Côte d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial development index, Côte d'Ivoire or Kyrgyzstan?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 0.1417 against 0.1374 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial development index between Côte d'Ivoire and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.0043, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Kyrgyzstan?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for financial development index?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 138th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 139th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Development Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.