Eswatini vs Guyana: Financial Development Index
Financial Development Index over time
- Eswatini
- Guyana
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.1552 against 0.1464 in Guyana, a difference of 0.0088.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Guyana ahead.
Eswatini ranks 133rd and Guyana ranks 135th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Guyana in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1175 | 0.1533 | 0.0358 | Guyana |
| 1990s | 0.1601 | 0.1219 | 0.0382 | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.1163 | 0.1397 | 0.0234 | Guyana |
| 2010s | 0.1528 | 0.1423 | 0.0105 | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.1552 | 0.1464 | 0.0088 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial development index, Eswatini or Guyana?
- Eswatini, at 0.1552 against 0.1464 in Guyana as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial development index between Eswatini and Guyana?
- 0.0088, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guyana?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Eswatini and Guyana rank globally for financial development index?
- Eswatini ranks 133rd and Guyana ranks 135th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Development Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.