Eswatini vs Mozambique: Financial Development Index
Financial Development Index over time
- Eswatini
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 0.1554 against 0.1552 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0002.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 133rd and Mozambique ranks 132nd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 4 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1175 | 0 | 0.1175 | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 0.1601 | 0.0789 | 0.0812 | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.1163 | 0.0939 | 0.0224 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.1528 | 0.1211 | 0.0317 | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.1552 | 0.1554 | 0.0003 | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial development index, Eswatini or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 0.1554 against 0.1552 in Eswatini as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial development index between Eswatini and Mozambique?
- 0.0002, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mozambique?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Eswatini and Mozambique rank globally for financial development index?
- Eswatini ranks 133rd and Mozambique ranks 132nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Development Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.