Hong Kong, China vs Italy: Financial Development Index
Financial Development Index over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Italy
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.7794 against 0.7732 in Italy, a difference of 0.0062.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 10th and Italy ranks 11th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 4 and Italy in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.4486 | 0.3064 | 0.1423 | Hong Kong, China |
| 1990s | 0.5949 | 0.4732 | 0.1217 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2000s | 0.736 | 0.7546 | 0.0186 | Italy |
| 2010s | 0.7643 | 0.7625 | 0.0018 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 0.7794 | 0.7732 | 0.0062 | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial development index, Hong Kong, China or Italy?
- Hong Kong, China, at 0.7794 against 0.7732 in Italy as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial development index between Hong Kong, China and Italy?
- 0.0062, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Italy?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Italy rank globally for financial development index?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 10th and Italy ranks 11th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Development Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.