Kiribati vs Marshall Islands: Financial Development Index
Financial Development Index over time
- Kiribati
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0.0976 against 0.0966 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Kiribati ranks 164th and Marshall Islands ranks 165th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Marshall Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 1990s | 0.0325 | 0.0395 | 0.007 | Marshall Islands |
| 2000s | 0.1057 | 0.1 | 0.0057 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 0.0983 | 0.1099 | 0.0116 | Marshall Islands |
| 2020s | 0.0976 | 0.0966 | 0.0009 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial development index, Kiribati or Marshall Islands?
- Kiribati, at 0.0976 against 0.0966 in Marshall Islands as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial development index between Kiribati and Marshall Islands?
- 0.001, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Marshall Islands?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Kiribati and Marshall Islands rank globally for financial development index?
- Kiribati ranks 164th and Marshall Islands ranks 165th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Development Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.