Mongolia vs Saint Lucia: Financial Development Index
Financial Development Index over time
- Mongolia
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.3305 against 0.328 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.0025.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 71st and Saint Lucia ranks 72nd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Saint Lucia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.2832 | 0.2832 | Saint Lucia |
| 1990s | 0.0954 | 0.324 | 0.2286 | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 0.1898 | 0.3408 | 0.151 | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 0.3313 | 0.3194 | 0.0119 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.3305 | 0.328 | 0.0025 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial development index, Mongolia or Saint Lucia?
- Mongolia, at 0.3305 against 0.328 in Saint Lucia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial development index between Mongolia and Saint Lucia?
- 0.0025, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Saint Lucia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Saint Lucia rank globally for financial development index?
- Mongolia ranks 71st and Saint Lucia ranks 72nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Development Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.