Africa vs Croatia: Financial Institutions Access Index
Financial Institutions Access Index over time
- Africa
- Croatia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.8054 against 0.1373 in Africa, a difference of 0.6681.
That makes Croatia's figure about 5.9 times Africa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Africa ahead.
Africa ranks 9th and Croatia ranks 12th of 9 groups.
Across the 5 decades both report, Africa averaged higher in 1 and Croatia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0466 | 0 | 0.0466 | Africa |
| 1990s | 0.0531 | 0.2971 | 0.244 | Croatia |
| 2000s | 0.0691 | 0.6261 | 0.557 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.1316 | 0.8704 | 0.7389 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.1373 | 0.8054 | 0.6681 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions access index, Africa or Croatia?
- Croatia, at 0.8054 against 0.1373 in Africa as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions access index between Africa and Croatia?
- 0.6681, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa and Croatia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Africa and Croatia rank globally for financial institutions access index?
- Africa ranks 9th and Croatia ranks 12th of 9 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Access Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.